| Title |
Mechanical regulation of glycolysis via cytoskeleton architecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-1998-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Suk Park, Christoph J. Burckhardt, Rossana Lazcano, Luisa M. Solis, Tadamoto Isogai, Linqing Li, Christopher S. Chen, Boning Gao, John D. Minna, Robert Bachoo, Ralph J. DeBerardinis, Gaudenz Danuser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 287 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 15 | 5% |
| Germany | 11 | 4% |
| France | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 92 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 141 | 49% |
| Scientists | 128 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 704 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 704 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 167 | 24% |
| Researcher | 124 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 4% |
| Other | 100 | 14% |
| Unknown | 177 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 217 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 11% |
| Engineering | 48 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 3% |
| Other | 89 | 13% |
| Unknown | 206 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 250. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#151,765
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#9,584
of 98,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,179
of 483,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#234
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.