| Title |
Transcriptional effects of copy number alterations in a large set of human cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14605-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arkajyoti Bhattacharya, Rico D. Bense, Carlos G. Urzúa-Traslaviña, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt, Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 60% |
| Scientists | 14 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,291,601
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,242
of 52,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,915
of 459,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#603
of 1,429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.