@WashburneAlex Given the REPEATED emphasis of intrepid WIV researchers on cleavage site acquisition of covids, WHY did the initial 2020 report and genomic characterization of covid-19 by Shi and colleagues *FAIL TO MENTION* the critically important FCS?
@Sri_Baqri @CellCellPress @stuartjdneil @whittakerIDlab Given the REPEATED emphasis of intrepid WIV researchers on cleavage site acquisition of covids, WHY did the initial report and genomic characterization of covid-19 by Shi and colleagues *FAIL TO MEN
@LD_Sceptics None of the references show virus isolation, but do show contamination of tissue samples with viral transport medium. The premise of the article is false as no new virus was ever found & PCR was therefore not calibrated with "Sars-Cov-2".
RT @DialecticBio: 2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious…
RT @DialecticBio: 2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious…
RT @DialecticBio: 2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious…
RT @DialecticBio: 2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious…
RT @DialecticBio: 2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious…
2) The way the above screenshot is worded makes it sound like there are *no* nonysnonymous mutations (which is suspicious I guess?) between SARVS-Cov-2 and RaTG13's spike protein... but I counted 19 https://t.co/TV08EcygKl The race science/lab leak fans a
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @HansMahncke: @WashburneAlex It's the Feb 3 Nature piece. Frieman feigned a false alarm because Shi mentioned RaTG13. In truth she had n…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
@WashburneAlex It's the Feb 3 Nature piece. Frieman feigned a false alarm because Shi mentioned RaTG13. In truth she had no choice after its existence was revealed by another group. Shi also covered up the existence of a FCS so she knew exactly what CCP mi
@RicketRobin @HL3133 @HouseGOP @RepMGriffith Take your pick, there was two. But only 'one' offers a Zoonotic offering 👇 https://t.co/rsIw5e8v2k
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
RT @demauyo_tadaimo: お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ h…
お兄ちゃん、新型コロナウイルスが常在菌って?新型コロナは最も近いSARSですらゲノム塩基配列が80%しか似てないの。ごく最近ヒト世界に入ってきたのは明らか。「平和共存」になるには長い時間がかかりそうね…というか、そもそも菌じゃないよ https://t.co/di8QMYmXO1
@BeedeGee @wayne_kag @elonmusk Assumptions? COVID's origin has been designed with the guise of "good intentions" years ago https://t.co/mHoVmeLukt https://t.co/jVB8jg64xH https://t.co/2zMU7fyOrc https://t.co/Vbmfjx8oev https://t.co/XtRrCHnJ7O
RT @flodebarre: Tout naît d'imprécisions dans la présentation du virus dans l'article paru ds Nature qui identifie SARS-CoV-2 comme l'agent…
Tout naît d'imprécisions dans la présentation du virus dans l'article paru ds Nature qui identifie SARS-CoV-2 comme l'agent infectieux causant les pneumonies inexpliquées à Wuhan. L'origine et l'historique du virus n'y sont pas détaillés précisément. ▫️2/
@sambadouro https://t.co/EDpv19yVjP どうぞ この様にまさくんが逃げるのでスペースにお誘いしてるんですが どうあっても上がりたくないみたいですね?
@Ayjchan It's actually not suspicious that they missed the FCS once you go through these details: https://t.co/IDqsxGrgcB
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
@MAFIA__Russia @R_H_Ebright @jhouse678 your sharp and ask the right questions, but that answer is complicated. Short answer is everyone intentionally missed it, including Baric https://t.co/w56eaWsv8E https://t.co/V8d2naXZ0A
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
@elonmusk @DrJBhattacharya "Human Optimized" or hOptimize Gain of Function https://t.co/JZrMYh1Gbg
@SaiKate108 genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in host
@robinmonotti 🧵16/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease i
RT @KeithEv84928885: @BillyBostickson The dichotomy of internecine warfare, even at the WIV. Even in the 🇨🇳 AMMS (PLA) there are good peopl…
@BillyBostickson The dichotomy of internecine warfare, even at the WIV. Even in the 🇨🇳 AMMS (PLA) there are good people wanting the truth out for the sake of humanity! Just FACTS 👇 https://t.co/J3JpeSzTSS
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @Biol4Ever: @philipcball The sequence was known by Dr Shi on 2 Jan 2000 https://t.co/rVfCNULRIT and in her published paper with the sequ…
@RWMaloneMD 🧵3/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in h
@RWMaloneMD 🧵16/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in
🧵16/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in host
@brandon_j_banks You might benefit from learning about what the lab engineered Wuhan Spike Protein is about, so you know what your are injecting into your circulatory system. #VaccineDeaths https://t.co/JZrMYh2e0O
🧵16/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in host
RT @Biol4Ever: @philipcball The sequence was known by Dr Shi on 2 Jan 2000 https://t.co/rVfCNULRIT and in her published paper with the sequ…
@philipcball The sequence was known by Dr Shi on 2 Jan 2000 https://t.co/rVfCNULRIT and in her published paper with the sequence (received 20 Jan, accepted 29 Jan) https://t.co/7HFs557Nhf, still no mention of the FCS - so several weeks without noticing the
@Project_Veritas @pfizer 🧵16/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causin
RT @minimikan_ver2: @2536c5d320f1431 @MHLWitter 本気で何を言っているんですか? この論文は既に査読を終えていますよ。 https://t.co/BCGqFTrftU で、あなたは査読できる立場ではありませんし、そもそも査読のシ…
RT @minimikan_ver2: @RS2YXEXO1cOu3iO 感染研の論文はこちらです。 https://t.co/I17ZT0oV1z COVID-19発生最初期の論文はこちら。 https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l よく分かりもしないのに、『論文なん…
@RS2YXEXO1cOu3iO 感染研の論文はこちらです。 https://t.co/I17ZT0oV1z COVID-19発生最初期の論文はこちら。 https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l よく分かりもしないのに、『論文なんてないと思いますよ』とか言わない方がいいですよ。 特に私は素人ではないので。 あと、開示請求ネタからも、勝手に解釈しない方がいいですよ。
@AlexBerenson @NEJM 🧵3/ genome, but 96.2% similarity to a highly questionable bat “Coronavirus” named RaTG13, https://t.co/rJFFtyjYUx, in which study Zhou did not purified &isolated a replication-competent intracellular parasite capable of causing dise
Here we are back into playing whack a mole with 10k Q larpers & 5G propagandists. Thanks Elmo, you'll help get 10s of thousands of fools killed or disabled playing freakin head games. That's one way to attack the social safety net, flood it with nitwit
RT @KeithEv84928885: @tony_vandongen The 'unadvertised' historical Facts 👇 https://t.co/MtQuqJwGbY
@tony_vandongen The 'unadvertised' historical Facts 👇 https://t.co/MtQuqJwGbY
RT @minimikan_ver2: @kim_kim86 @ero20160817 >ウイルス分離の対照実験がされたこともなく これも間違いで、COVID-19最初期の論文でも、ちゃんとcontrolが置かれた上で、SARS-CoV-2でのみCPEが確認されていますね。…
@kim_kim86 @ero20160817 >ウイルス分離の対照実験がされたこともなく これも間違いで、COVID-19最初期の論文でも、ちゃんとcontrolが置かれた上で、SARS-CoV-2でのみCPEが確認されていますね。 https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l https://t.co/nQRt61tGca
@Koji_RisingSun 第一にあなたの『対照実験をしないの?』という質問の答えになっているのですが、理解できますか? で、今のあなたの返答も、私の回答への返答になっていないですよ。 https://t.co/DOxwSabqRQ ちゃんとエビデンスを示して回答しているので、話を逸らさずに返答してくださいね。
@Koji_RisingSun ウイルスの研究してるので、素人さんに言われなくても十分理解していますよ。 で、なんで私の回答に返答しないんですか?? https://t.co/P0IrB32RWf
@Koji_RisingSun control置かれてますよ。どこのデマ情報を信じているんですか? https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l ウイルスの分離について指摘があるならレターを書けばいいのに、科学的に指摘できないから、それが一つもありませんね。 CoVプライマーやNGSを使っているので、未知のものでも十分解析可能です。
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
帖子 4-7 的来源包括: 4) NIH 文档位于 https://t.co/gI813Stt6q… 5) DARPA 文件在 https://t.co/wbThAlh32T… 6) 石正丽专访 https://t.co/jFSJYYUuJ8… 7)https://t.co/XtQQV5Yfzv…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
@yukatinmorimori @inakanotami_ink @MIKITO_777 子供の健康を願う人に、そんな荒唐無稽なデマを流さないでください。 新型コロナウイルスを始め、ウイルスはとっくに分離同定され、分析されています。 人の想いに付け込んだデマは絶対許せませんし、あなたを軽蔑します。 https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…