@TheSeeker268 @ydeigin First stating it was zoonosis seems a strange way of covering it up https://t.co/p3SIm2HMNA https://t.co/3l7FfyLtIf
RT @sambadouro: 「不十分な論文を独自に裏付け」とされる別の論文より⇩ https://t.co/8kbWGP68Qz 裏付けになっていません🤯 https://t.co/z3m3lExtRz
「不十分な論文を独自に裏付け」とされる別の論文より⇩ https://t.co/8kbWGP68Qz 裏付けになっていません🤯 https://t.co/z3m3lExtRz
@ryangrim Zhou observed cytopathic effects (CPE) after 96 hours in VERO E6 (green monkey kidney) cell line injected with unpurified, assumed "viral" particles + toxic chemicals that could cause the observed cell breakdown. No negative control was provided
@ryangrim - Zhou et al: Genbank: MN996527.1 : https://t.co/SHwZIO8MAT https://t.co/rJFFtyjr4Z
@AngryCardio @BenMazer @boback WIV's closest virus, RaTG13, is mentioned in Quammen's article. Its full sequence was published on 3 Feb 2020. And as expected, WIV had published or submitted for publication several partial sequences from RaTG13 before 2020.
@GuyWalsh13 @thebadstats Yes. But for an update this thread though explains something Yuri in the discussion said was "suspicious" about one of the early WIV papers on SARS-COV-2: https://t.co/fK1O9bhYwp
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
@yolonyaum @danielchannel 以下の論文でもコッホの4原則が成立しています。 (1)同定(2)分離 https://t.co/fCNj6N7wRf… (3)感染実験(4)同症状の確認及び同病原体の検出 https://t.co/LpdhT5bw6x… (3-4)の再現性確認 https://t.co/yf1fB1Gfk1
@alchemytoday @realsnacktime @flodebarre Good idea, some post mortem: https://t.co/Z9QX8UIioK
@drscottjensen @Dr_logicaI - Zhou et al: Genbank: MN996527.1 : https://t.co/SHwZIO8MAT https://t.co/rJFFtyjr4Z
@scotthortonshow @catoletters Zhou observed cytopathic effects (CPE) after 96 hours in VERO E6 (green monkey kidney) cell line injected with unpurified, assumed "viral" particles + toxic chemicals that could cause the observed cell breakdown. No negative c
@scotthortonshow @catoletters - Zhou et al: Genbank: MN996527.1 : https://t.co/SHwZIO8MAT https://t.co/rJFFtyjr4Z
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
@kengann101 @MmeBlackBalloon @davidemccune @BallouxFrancois I think it's likely many people at WIV compared SARS2 with their database, because ~5 days after the picture at the restaurant, WIV submitted a paper with many authors describing a virus ~96% simi
@visjevangen @gdemaneuf @BallouxFrancois @gadboit @ThomasC25445351 Yes, it's nearly certain the WIV lab had compared SARS2 against its database by 15 Jan 2020, because ~5 days later Nature received WIV's paper describing a virus they had with ~96% similari
@Jikkyleaks @Roper_Lab Zhou observed cytopathic effects (CPE) after 96 hours in VERO E6 (green monkey kidney) cell line injected with unpurified, assumed "viral" particles + toxic chemicals that could cause the observed cell breakdown. No negative control
@Jikkyleaks @Roper_Lab Here are the very two fraudulent "SarsCov2" genome sequence, the basis of all Covid19 PCR tests: - FanWu et al: Genbank: MN908947 - Wuhan-Hu-1 : https://t.co/dfT8Matpaf https://t.co/XpctHTzsSE - Zhou et al: Genbank: MN996527.1 : ht
@Jikkyleaks @RepBradWenstrup @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @chrismartenson Zhou observed cytopathic effects (CPE) after 96 hours in VERO E6 (green monkey kidney) cell line injected with unpurified, assumed "viral" particles + toxic chemicals that could cause the
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
Ese paper que usted ha enviado referencia a otros aislados de otro paper de ZhengLi. https://t.co/egSomsF3Az Consultando ese otro paper también publicado el 3 de febrero de 2020, se dice que el tipo de células que usaron para aislamientos, son células Vero
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
Take a guess why WIV didn’t publish the furin cleavage site?
@wanderer_jasnah Thank you for your very interesting thread. What do you think about the furin cleavage site not being mentioned in the Nature Zhou et al. 2020 paper https://t.co/NCoioGV9zj?
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @carolina_bonita: A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin https://t.co/ft4JsCpCdE https://t.co/q6…
A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin https://t.co/LboyI8hRkj @RTB_HRoss
@q7WtcDGNmLU4 @YSUbQAIZELAa5Ne @kohkohqq gdpさんのおっしゃる通り、ウイルスが存在し、分離されて解析されているのは、既に周知の事実ですよ。 https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
@miura5951652221 @toipu11 論文も公開されてますよー! 3年以上前からずっと https://t.co/wyINZdBB6l
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
RT @zhihuachen: Takes Alex’s tweets to clarify how nasty these accusations have been.
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
Takes Alex’s tweets to clarify how nasty these accusations have been.
RT @acritschristoph: Two scientists they named, Ben Hu and Yan Zhu are in Shi's lab. They are authors on the first paper on SARS-CoV-2: htt…
@LaymansScience @BreezerGalway @ComedyConley @PeterHotez They showed a genome for a virus. Lovely. Where is the virus? They didn't have it. https://t.co/AsfScPq5Lc
RT @An0nAKn0wledge: 2017 report: Bats in China carry all the ingredients to make a new SARS virus as worked on by Shi Zhengli: https://t.co…
RT @An0nAKn0wledge: A SARS cluster circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence: https://t.co/e8PbRCLZ4A A pneumonia o…
@SHomburg 1. Februar 2020 Zheng-Li Shi(Bat-Woman) veröffentlichte eine Arbeit, wonach der nahste Verwandte von SARS Cov2 der Virus RaTG13, ein SARS Cov von Hufeisennasen-Fledermäusen aus einer Mine in der Provinz Yunnan 2013, sein soll (Ähnlichkeit 96,1%)
RT @Jojo99275148: @simsome2020 @OopsGuess 石正麗於2020年3月在《自然科學》發表的報告證實了武漢P4實驗室是新冠病毒來源。 https://t.co/ZDcZMgiesc https://t.co/4fK6Djud6l
RT @tommy_cleary: @MonaRahalkar @Graybea71861266 @SharriMarkson @McWLuke @nidovirus2023 @Baric_Lab Kind of untrue then? https://t.co/XTt6bq…
@MonaRahalkar @Graybea71861266 @SharriMarkson @McWLuke @nidovirus2023 @Baric_Lab Kind of untrue then? https://t.co/XTt6bq4Nma <<We have done bat virus surveillance in Hubei Province for many years, but have not found bats in Wuhan or even wider Hubei
RT @Jojo99275148: @simsome2020 @OopsGuess 石正麗於2020年3月在《自然科學》發表的報告證實了武漢P4實驗室是新冠病毒來源。 https://t.co/ZDcZMgiesc https://t.co/4fK6Djud6l
@simsome2020 @OopsGuess 石正麗於2020年3月在《自然科學》發表的報告證實了武漢P4實驗室是新冠病毒來源。 https://t.co/ZDcZMgiesc https://t.co/4fK6Djud6l
@MartinaSisters @franciscodeasis @BillyBostickson There's nothing weird going on there. They had uploaded patient data WIV01-WIVXX. They added RaTG13 SRA and asked for help there. Si Haorui is on the paper. https://t.co/hWZ5vhRx6t
"The Wuhan Institute of Virology’s first report on the outbreak, published February 3rd, 2020, and entitled, 'A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin,' was written in part by Ben Hu and Yan Zhu." https://t.co/vencBN6wW
RT @Yastreblyansky: Kind of interesting that Ben Hu is listed as a co-author (he worked on the genome sequencing, "gain of function" resear…
Kind of interesting that Ben Hu is listed as a co-author (he worked on the genome sequencing, "gain of function" research isn't mentioned) in an early paper from Wuhan (2/20) https://t.co/EI7ZqY7bH9 assuming zoonotic origin on the basis of patients zero no
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for posts 4-7 include the following: 4) NIH documents at https://t.co/V8NUnIRjuO 5) DARPA documents at https://t…
Then the Pandemic, and just afterwards.. 30th January 2020 (Yan Zhu, Peng Zhou, ZLS) SARS coronavirus 2 WIV06 Project https://t.co/FyGiNGZLVd and the paper (usual suspects) pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin
RT @sambadouro: @4e574f363636 でも続く弁解はこうですね⇩ >が、我々の発見は別の研究でさらなる患者についても独立して裏付けられています29。 29のリンク先を見たら同時期に書かれたこちらの論文で(やはり細胞培養) https://t.co/8k…
@4e574f363636 でも続く弁解はこうですね⇩ >が、我々の発見は別の研究でさらなる患者についても独立して裏付けられています29。 29のリンク先を見たら同時期に書かれたこちらの論文で(やはり細胞培養) https://t.co/8kbWGP68Qz こんなふうに書いてありました⇩ 全然裏付けられてません💦 https://t.co/T2qpgwA7CZ
@HBO_by_Sean Interestingly, this group also attempted to create the genome of SC2 by de novo assembly. However, they didn't upload it, as far as I can tell. https://t.co/z2KK9dGS8h
RT @franciscodeasis: How it was the most important article in 2020 vs How we now know it should have been thanks to #DRASTIC https://t.co/…
RT @humblesci: censorship of original name of RaTG13 (Ra4991) NB Zhou et al discuss insertions in the NTD of S1, but fail to even mention a…
RT @humblesci: censorship of original name of RaTG13 (Ra4991) NB Zhou et al discuss insertions in the NTD of S1, but fail to even mention a…
RT @humblesci: censorship of original name of RaTG13 (Ra4991) NB Zhou et al discuss insertions in the NTD of S1, but fail to even mention a…
RT @humblesci: censorship of original name of RaTG13 (Ra4991) NB Zhou et al discuss insertions in the NTD of S1, but fail to even mention a…
censorship of original name of RaTG13 (Ra4991) NB Zhou et al discuss insertions in the NTD of S1, but fail to even mention a key insert, one which the WIV has shown key previous interest in https://t.co/p3SIm2HMNA https://t.co/ktz9yNxPQE
@holisticgrenade @ThiomargaritaNA @logosaetos @thesassymicrobe . . . . . . . ( I couldn't find that study - could you provide a link? ) . [ Here's a link to one of the relevant studies which I could find: ] https://t.co/8WQw83ohjO
RT @franciscodeasis: - It seems they just wanted to buy time for not publishing the viruses very early in the pandemic. I guess to avoid be…
RT @franciscodeasis: - It seems they just wanted to buy time for not publishing the viruses very early in the pandemic. I guess to avoid be…
RT @franciscodeasis: - It seems they just wanted to buy time for not publishing the viruses very early in the pandemic. I guess to avoid be…
@AKudunov @aoihimmel @the_ins_ru Ну вот, вы придумываете или просто врете, или просто почитала где-то и не проверяете.🤡 Ши Чжэнли в своих статьях, как раз, пишет что вирус произошел от летучих мышей, с чем согласно подавляющее число экспертов: 1. https://
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…
@AliZuha34436928 @babydelics @dina02562953 @dusooma @IsmailShaukath A study published in the journal Nature in February 2020 provided evidence of the isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2. You can read the study here: https://t.co/9TmsAwKkJM
RT @R_H_Ebright: Sources for point 9 include: 9) WIV research article and erratum at https://t.co/ybAOOAx1X8 and https://t.co/sI2lv8C8K3;…