↓ Skip to main content

A dog oviduct-on-a-chip model of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A dog oviduct-on-a-chip model of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-58507-4
Authors

Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz, Jennifer Beth Nagashima, Bastien Venzac, Séverine Le Gac, Nucharin Songsasen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Engineering 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,663,504
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#44,166
of 89,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,567
of 328,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.