↓ Skip to main content

Publisher Correction: Dietary salt promotes cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Publisher Correction: Dietary salt promotes cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation
Published in
Nature, January 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1925-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Faraco, Karin Hochrainer, Steven G. Segarra, Samantha Schaeffer, Monica M. Santisteban, Ajay Menon, Hong Jiang, David M. Holtzman, Josef Anrather, Costantino Iadecola

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,363,481
of 19,190,141 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,276
of 83,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,408
of 407,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#729
of 844 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,190,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 844 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.