Title |
Cascading and pulse-like ruptures during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-13750-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kejie Chen, Jean-Philippe Avouac, Saif Aati, Chris Milliner, Fu Zheng, Chuang Shi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 27% |
Canada | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 62% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,794,683
of 24,213,557 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,417
of 51,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,588
of 463,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#732
of 1,457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.