RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGv…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
#climate alarmists - Is the “science” you are basing policy on dependent on the idea that if the models cannot replicate it, then we should ignore it? Or that it doesn’t really exist? This is Orwellian madness, not science. Not a #climateemergency
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
Models don’t simulate AMO therefore it doesn’t exist.
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
🤔
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
Edgy alarmists endorse ENSO, as the ONLY natural ocean cycle, so when it’s weak or neutral it allows them to promote their spurious ‘’CO2 theory’’ when warming still occurs. All major ocean oscillations have been peak warm in the last 5 years (ENSO, AMO,
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
RT @NikolovScience: Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claimin…
Two examples of JUNK climate science published in journal Nature: - Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) claiming that decadal climatic oscillations like PDO & AMO were random noise. - Neukom et al (2019: https://t.co/8hAfjnrKG4) claiming that
Als complexe natuurlijke processen niet door de modellen gereproduceerd kunnen worden dan bestaan ze gewoonweg niet. Huh? Zouden die modellen dan wel kloppen? Ongelofelijk. Zo werken de klimaat wetenschappers van tegenwoordig. En iedereen gelooft het. Man
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGv…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGv…
RT @NikolovScience: @CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perver…
@CurmudgeonlyOpa Good question? The paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) exemplifies the level of perversion of the scientific method that modern climate science has achieved. They are trying to eliminate/deny all natural cycles that "distur
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
RT @NikolovScience: What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGv…
RT @NikolovScience: What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGv…
RT @NikolovScience: A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years…
What's the reason for the conclusion about non-existence of PDO and AMO reached by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA)? This is UNBELIEVABLE, but these authors think that, since climate models cannot reproduce PDOs & AMOs, these must not be real
"Here we use a combination of observational data and state-of-the-art forced and control climate model simulations" WITH A CLIMATE MODEL SIMULATION I COULD PROVE THAT DONALD DUCK'S HOUSE WAS DESTROYED BY A HURRICANE.
A recent paper by Mann et al (2020: https://t.co/y3VGvze4eA) attempts to re-write climate history of the past 150 years by claiming that well-known decadal oscillations such as AMO and PDO are just random noise caused by volcanic eruptions & human sulf
@Korhoraattori2 Ei selitä. "Humans held responsible for twists and turns of climate change since 1900" (not AMO) https://t.co/aGHvD4pTEy "Absence of internal multidecadal and interdecadal oscillations in climate model simulations" https://t.co/xyLwlD0z
@grant_farquhar @CubaRaglanGuy https://t.co/n7lvQoLWpg "..we use a combination of observational data and state-of-the-art forced and control climate model simulations.." Historical observations: "In contrast with earlier studies12,13,62, we find no evi
RT @tan123: Do you deny that the "dramatic" 1976 Pacific Climate Shift happened? If not, do you think that humans caused it? https://t.co/…
RT @tan123: Do you deny that the "dramatic" 1976 Pacific Climate Shift happened? If not, do you think that humans caused it? https://t.co/…
RT @tan123: Do you deny that the "dramatic" 1976 Pacific Climate Shift happened? If not, do you think that humans caused it? https://t.co/…
RT @tan123: Do you deny that the "dramatic" 1976 Pacific Climate Shift happened? If not, do you think that humans caused it? https://t.co/…
Do you deny that the "dramatic" 1976 Pacific Climate Shift happened? If not, do you think that humans caused it? https://t.co/GKzUSC0NeI
@tan123 FYI ... https://t.co/nE1sHM7S7j
RT @mikarantane: @MVirtanen @puotila @helleaalto Uusimpien tutkimusten mukaan (ilmestyneet tuon paperin jälkeen) ainakaan globaalissa meren…
@MVirtanen @puotila @helleaalto Uusimpien tutkimusten mukaan (ilmestyneet tuon paperin jälkeen) ainakaan globaalissa merenpintalämpötilassa ei ole sisäisiä monivuosikymmenisiä oskillaatioita: https://t.co/2n0oZrvPYf
RT @GabeFilippelli: @MichaelEMann making an impact! And he still does great science: https://t.co/HkqCcQUkWw
RT @GabeFilippelli: @MichaelEMann making an impact! And he still does great science: https://t.co/HkqCcQUkWw
RT @GabeFilippelli: @MichaelEMann making an impact! And he still does great science: https://t.co/HkqCcQUkWw
Much obliged Gabriel! 🙏🙂
@MichaelEMann making an impact! And he still does great science: https://t.co/HkqCcQUkWw
@DawnTJ90 Here is a link to Mann's paper examining AMO and PDO. In it, he even admits his prior PDO paper got it wrong. If you can find fault in his analysis, please explain it to us. https://t.co/qhBZcLkNJ8
@rahmstorf @Balelt41 Wichtiger Artikel von @MichaelEMann und weiteren: Absence of internal multidecadal and interdecadal oscillations in climate model simulations | Nature Communications https://t.co/lI5fMazfVt
the pdo and amo might not be real and nobody on #wxtwitter seems to have noticed https://t.co/Z2h4iNdETM
RT @Gergyl: Worth a look, if into these things. For a while there seemed like hunting for new 'oscillations' was climate publishing de rig…
Worth a look, if into these things. For a while there seemed like hunting for new 'oscillations' was climate publishing de rigueur.
Absence of internal multidecadal and interdecadal oscillations in climate model simulations. https://t.co/wWzUN9ChV8
RT @voooos: While I was on vacation, Mann et al released a new study adding further doubts that multidecade-long swings in the ocean influe…
RT @MichaelEMann: We reference and discuss that previous study in the article: https://t.co/Emk46iJ5kE I would argue that our analysis is f…
RT @MichaelEMann: We reference and discuss that previous study in the article: https://t.co/Emk46iJ5kE I would argue that our analysis is f…
We reference and discuss that previous study in the article: https://t.co/Emk46iJ5kE I would argue that our analysis is far more comprehensive and definitive.