| Title |
Absence of internal multidecadal and interdecadal oscillations in climate model simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-13823-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann, Byron A. Steinman, Sonya K. Miller |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 725 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 164 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 59 | 8% |
| Canada | 38 | 5% |
| Australia | 34 | 5% |
| Germany | 9 | 1% |
| Ireland | 6 | <1% |
| Finland | 6 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 51 | 7% |
| Unknown | 347 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 612 | 84% |
| Scientists | 88 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 70 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 596. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#36,175
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#607
of 52,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#783
of 467,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#13
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.