| Title |
Ensuring science is useful, usable and used in global disaster risk reduction and sustainable development: a view through the Sendai framework lens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palcomms.2016.16 |
| Authors |
Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Kevin Blanchard, Virginia Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| Italy | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 15% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,713,864
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#466
of 2,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,411
of 319,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.