↓ Skip to main content

Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53804-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Jordan, Jan Tiede, Oliver Lojek, Jan Visscher, Heiko Apel, Hong Quan Nguyen, Chau Nguyen Xuan Quang, Torsten Schlurmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 56 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 16%
Engineering 27 16%
Environmental Science 23 14%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#499,545
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,507
of 143,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,788
of 480,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#158
of 4,121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.