↓ Skip to main content

Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53804-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Jordan, Jan Tiede, Oliver Lojek, Jan Visscher, Heiko Apel, Hong Quan Nguyen, Chau Nguyen Xuan Quang, Torsten Schlurmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 56 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 16%
Engineering 27 16%
Environmental Science 23 14%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#479,046
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,299
of 141,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,390
of 476,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#153
of 4,116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.