| Title |
What constitutes appropriate peer review for interdisciplinary research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palcomms.2016.17 |
| Authors |
Gabriele Bammer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 24% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 67% |
| Scientists | 17 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Qatar | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#755,916
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#211
of 2,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,225
of 313,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.