Peer 5
Much less obscure (and not inconsequential).
Much less obscure (and not inconsequential).
There was a good reason why I posted the message citing our follow-up review. In the original paper in Nature we did not describe the theory behind the evolution of local mutation rates in sufficient…
I haven't seen an interesting comment in weeks (months?).
I think the criticisms of PMC are a little unfair. Although there are inconsequential points of information like this and also the vitamin D brigade, there are also quite detailed and even critical…
I think very few people are willing to post anything other than complements about the paper or self-serving comments such as this. There is too much fear of reprisal for posting thoughtful comments…
These PubMed commons comments are getting really bad. I haven't seen an interesting one in weeks. If it keeps up like this it will be shuttered and it's too bad.
Inigo Martincorena | Jul 28 2015 07:12 ESTReaders of this article may be interested in a follow-up review where we discussed in more detail the theory behind the evolution of local mutation rates…