↓ Skip to main content

Gilteritinib improves outcomes in AML

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Gilteritinib improves outcomes in AML
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41571-019-0305-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Sidaway

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,624,674
of 24,307,517 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#1,361
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,952
of 464,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#24
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,307,517 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.