↓ Skip to main content

Field cress genome mapping: Integrating linkage and comparative maps with cytogenetic analysis for rDNA carrying chromosomes

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Field cress genome mapping: Integrating linkage and comparative maps with cytogenetic analysis for rDNA carrying chromosomes
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53320-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zeratsion Abera Desta, Bozena Kolano, Zeeshan Shamim, Susan J. Armstrong, Monika Rewers, Elwira Sliwinska, Sandeep Kumar Kushwaha, Isobel A. P. Parkin, Rodomiro Ortiz, Dirk-Jan de Koning

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,559,935
of 16,557,200 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#35,665
of 88,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,901
of 395,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#6,140
of 14,593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,557,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14,593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.