| Title |
Author Correction: Distinctive Clinical Effects of Haemorrhagic Markers in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-23383-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Young Kyoung Jang, Hee Jin Kim, Jin San Lee, Yeo Jin Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hyemin Jang, Juyoun Lee, Jong Min Lee, Seung-Joo Kim, Kyung-Ho Yu, Andreas Charidimou, David J. Werring, Sung Tae Kim, Duk L. Na, Sang Won Seo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,259,067
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#33,502
of 125,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,776
of 332,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,000
of 3,531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.