| Title |
Soil carbon science for policy and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-019-0431-y |
| Authors |
Mark A. Bradford, Chelsea J. Carey, Lesley Atwood, Deborah Bossio, Eli P. Fenichel, Sasha Gennet, Joseph Fargione, Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Emma Fuller, Daniel A. Kane, Johannes Lehmann, Emily E. Oldfield, Elsa M. Ordway, Joseph Rudek, Jonathan Sanderman, Stephen A. Wood |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 17% |
| Finland | 8 | 11% |
| Australia | 6 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 22% |
| Researcher | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 58 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 92 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#264,398
of 24,452,594 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#252
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,882
of 365,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#16
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 126.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.