↓ Skip to main content

Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and…

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 2,962)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
140 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1003 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
608 Mendeley
Title
Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Rooney Riggs, Erica F. Andersen, Athena M. Cherry, Sibel Kantarci, Hutton Kearney, Ankita Patel, Gordana Raca, Deborah I. Ritter, Sarah T. South, Erik C. Thorland, Daniel Pineda-Alvarez, Swaroop Aradhya, Christa Lese Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 608 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 104 17%
Student > Master 65 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 10%
Other 55 9%
Student > Bachelor 38 6%
Other 83 14%
Unknown 200 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 190 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 94 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 8%
Computer Science 10 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 220 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#316,069
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#50
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,059
of 383,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.