| Title |
Seeing mesoatomic distortions in soft-matter crystals of a double-gyroid block copolymer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1706-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xueyan Feng, Christopher J. Burke, Mujin Zhuo, Hua Guo, Kaiqi Yang, Abhiram Reddy, Ishan Prasad, Rong-Ming Ho, Apostolos Avgeropoulos, Gregory M. Grason, Edwin L. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 44% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 10 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#961,461
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#31,031
of 95,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,716
of 368,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#706
of 1,047 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,047 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.