↓ Skip to main content

Modulating cellular cytotoxicity and phototoxicity of fluorescent organic salts through counterion pairing

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Modulating cellular cytotoxicity and phototoxicity of fluorescent organic salts through counterion pairing
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-51593-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deanna Broadwater, Matthew Bates, Mayank Jayaram, Margaret Young, Jianzhou He, Austin L. Raithel, Thomas W. Hamann, Wei Zhang, Babak Borhan, Richard R. Lunt, Sophia Y. Lunt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Unspecified 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 22%
Unspecified 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Materials Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#327,461
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,726
of 141,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,271
of 376,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#109
of 4,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.