| Title |
Possible role of L-form switching in recurrent urinary tract infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-12359-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarzyna M. Mickiewicz, Yoshikazu Kawai, Lauren Drage, Margarida C. Gomes, Frances Davison, Robert Pickard, Judith Hall, Serge Mostowy, Phillip D. Aldridge, Jeff Errington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 394 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 57 | 14% |
| United States | 56 | 14% |
| Spain | 20 | 5% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 10 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 9 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 153 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 250 | 63% |
| Scientists | 113 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#12,248
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#239
of 58,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224
of 359,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#10
of 1,442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.