↓ Skip to main content

A multi-decade dataset of monthly beach profile surveys and inshore wave forcing at Narrabeen, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
A multi-decade dataset of monthly beach profile surveys and inshore wave forcing at Narrabeen, Australia
Published in
Scientific Data, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2016.24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian L. Turner, Mitchell D. Harley, Andrew D. Short, Joshua A. Simmons, Melissa A. Bracs, Matthew S. Phillips, Kristen D. Splinter

Abstract

Long-term observational datasets that record and quantify variability, changes and trends in beach morphology at sandy coastlines together with the accompanying wave climate are rare. A monthly beach profile survey program commenced in April 1976 at Narrabeen located on Sydney's Northern Beaches in southeast Australia is one of just a handful of sites worldwide where on-going and uninterrupted beach monitoring now spans multiple decades. With the Narrabeen survey program reaching its 40-year milestone in April 2016, it is timely that free and unrestricted use of these data be facilitated to support the next advances in beach erosion-recovery modelling. The archived dataset detailed here includes the monthly subaerial profiles, available bathymetry for each survey transect extending seawards to 20 m water depth, and time-series of ocean astronomical tide and inshore wave forcing at 10 m water depths, the latter corresponding to the location of individual survey transects. In addition, on-going access to the results of the continuing monthly survey program is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 61 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 23%
Engineering 43 21%
Environmental Science 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 80 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,760,639
of 24,201,556 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#720
of 2,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,649
of 305,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,201,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.