↓ Skip to main content

Independent neural mechanisms for bright and dark information in binocular stereopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Independent neural mechanisms for bright and dark information in binocular stereopsis
Published in
Nature, April 1995
DOI 10.1038/374808a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie M. Harris, Andrew J. Parker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
China 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Professor 8 24%
Other 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,595,686
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,923
of 91,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,616
of 25,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#104
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.