| Title |
Conflict of interest in nutrition research: an editorial perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41430-019-0488-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. J. Soares, M. J. Müller, H. Boeing, C. Maffeis, A. Misra, G. Muscogiuri, S. Muthayya, P. Newsholme, T. Wolever, S. Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 39% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,016,631
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#387
of 4,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,134
of 353,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.