| Title |
Reply to ‘Concerns about the feasibility of using “precision guided sterile males” to control insects’
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11617-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikolay P. Kandul, Junru Liu, Hector M. Sanchez C, Sean L. Wu, John M. Marshall, Omar S. Akbari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 39% |
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,172,952
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#44,728
of 52,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,571
of 344,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,283
of 1,476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.