| Title |
Classification of naturally evoked compound action potentials in peripheral nerve spatiotemporal recordings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-47450-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan G. L. Koh, Adrian I. Nachman, José Zariffa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,643,624
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#35,864
of 125,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,760
of 346,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,027
of 3,477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.