| Title |
The Effect of Electronic Cigarette User Modifications and E-liquid Adulteration on the Particle Size Profile of an Aerosolized Product
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-46387-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haley A. Mulder, Jesse L. Patterson, Matthew S. Halquist, Leon Kosmider, Joseph B. McGee Turner, Justin L Poklis, Alphonse Poklis, Michelle R. Peace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Guadeloupe | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,280,494
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#20,154
of 126,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,594
of 347,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#575
of 3,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.