| Title |
Electrical signalling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1038/360062a0 |
| Authors |
D. C. Wildon, J. F. Thain, P. E. H. Minchin, I. R. Gubb, A. J. Reilly, Y. D. Skipper, H. M. Doherty, P. J. O'Donnell, D. J. Bowles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,913,273
of 23,950,095 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#41,033
of 93,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#421
of 20,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#22
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,950,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.