| Title |
Use of numbers by a chimpanzee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1038/315057a0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tetsuro Matsuzawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Professor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,643,834
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#66,144
of 91,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,805
of 9,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#67
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.