↓ Skip to main content

Cost analysis of multiple sclerosis in Brazil: a cross-sectional multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Cost analysis of multiple sclerosis in Brazil: a cross-sectional multicenter study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1352-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilceia Lopes da Silva, Maira L. S. Takemoto, Alfredo Damasceno, Yara D. Fragoso, Alessandro Finkelsztejn, Jefferson Becker, Marcus V. M. Gonçalves, Charles Tilbery, Enedina M. L. de Oliveira, Dagoberto Callegaro, Fernanda C. Boulos

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system disease associated with irreversible progression of disability, which imposes a substantial socioeconomic onus. The objective of this study was to determine the economic impact of multiple sclerosis from the Brazilian household and healthcare system perspectives. Secondary objectives were to assess the impact of fatigue on daily living and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of MS patients. This is a cross-sectional study in which Brazilian eligible patients attending eight major MS specialized sites answered an interview capturing data on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, comorbidities, resource utilization, fatigue, utilities and health-related quality of life from November/2011 to May/2012 . Costs were assessed considering a prevalence-based approach within 1 year of resource consumption and were estimated by multiplying the amount used by the corresponding unit cost. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate or severe disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). In total, 210 patients who met eligibility criteria were included, 40 % had mild, 43 % moderate and 16 % severe disability; disability level was missing for 1 %. The average total direct cost per year was USD 19,012.32 (SD = 10,465.96), and no statistically significant differences were not observed according to MS disability level (p = 0.398). The use of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) corresponded to the majority of direct expenditures, especially among those patients with lower levels of disability, representing around 90 % of total costs for mild and moderate MS patients. It was also observed that expenses with medical (except DMTs) and non-medical resources are higher among patients with more severe disease. Worsening disability also had an important influence on health-related quality of life and self-perceived impact of fatigue on daily living. Our data demonstrates the significant economic impact of MS on both Brazilian household and health system, in terms of DMTs and other disease management costs. When patients move upwards on the disease severity scale, costs with health resources other than drugs are significantly increased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,482
of 7,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,974
of 300,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#84
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.