| Title |
Nanopore metagenomics enables rapid clinical diagnosis of bacterial lower respiratory infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-019-0156-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Themoula Charalampous, Gemma L. Kay, Hollian Richardson, Alp Aydin, Rossella Baldan, Christopher Jeanes, Duncan Rae, Sara Grundy, Daniel J. Turner, John Wain, Richard M. Leggett, David M. Livermore, Justin O’Grady |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 321 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 67 | 21% |
| United States | 51 | 16% |
| Australia | 15 | 5% |
| Spain | 14 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Singapore | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 95 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 167 | 52% |
| Scientists | 139 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 562 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 102 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 14% |
| Unknown | 165 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 132 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 43 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 192 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#156,968
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#314
of 8,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,976
of 368,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#5
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.