↓ Skip to main content

VCP and ATL1 regulate endoplasmic reticulum and protein synthesis for dendritic spine formation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
VCP and ATL1 regulate endoplasmic reticulum and protein synthesis for dendritic spine formation
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms11020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Tzu Shih, Yi-Ping Hsueh

Abstract

Imbalanced protein homeostasis, such as excessive protein synthesis and protein aggregation, is a pathogenic hallmark of a range of neurological disorders. Here, using expression of mutant proteins, a knockdown approach and disease mutation knockin mice, we show that VCP (valosin-containing protein), together with its cofactor P47 and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) morphology regulator ATL1 (Atlastin-1), regulates tubular ER formation and influences the efficiency of protein synthesis to control dendritic spine formation in neurons. Strengthening the significance of protein synthesis in dendritic spinogenesis, the translation blocker cyclohexamide and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin reduce dendritic spine density, while a leucine supplement that increases protein synthesis ameliorates the dendritic spine defects caused by Vcp and Atl1 deficiencies. Because VCP and ATL1 are the causative genes of several neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders, we suggest that impaired ER formation and inefficient protein synthesis are significant in the pathogenesis of multiple neurological disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 27%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 25%
Neuroscience 20 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,379,045
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,454
of 47,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,827
of 326,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#326
of 864 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 864 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.