| Title |
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Mercè Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J.G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A.C ’t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Mons, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan van der Lei, Erik van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, Barend Mons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 943 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 143 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 95 | 10% |
| Spain | 53 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 51 | 5% |
| Germany | 38 | 4% |
| France | 34 | 4% |
| Australia | 24 | 3% |
| Italy | 16 | 2% |
| Belgium | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 148 | 16% |
| Unknown | 326 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 646 | 69% |
| Scientists | 231 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 55 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 20 | <1% |
| United States | 18 | <1% |
| Spain | 11 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | <1% |
| Unknown | 7119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1430 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1155 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 801 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 417 | 6% |
| Other | 406 | 6% |
| Other | 1225 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1785 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 753 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 710 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 521 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 380 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 339 | 5% |
| Other | 2278 | 32% |
| Unknown | 2238 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,949
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#2
of 3,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43
of 315,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.