↓ Skip to main content

The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,507)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
9755 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7307 Mendeley
citeulike
20 CiteULike
Title
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Published in
Scientific Data, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Mercè Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J.G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A.C ’t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Mons, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan van der Lei, Erik van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, Barend Mons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 942 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 20 <1%
United States 18 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 7207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1442 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1168 16%
Student > Master 806 11%
Student > Bachelor 422 6%
Other 408 6%
Other 1239 17%
Unknown 1822 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 758 10%
Computer Science 717 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 525 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 385 5%
Environmental Science 340 5%
Other 2304 32%
Unknown 2278 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,931
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#2
of 3,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41
of 315,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.