| Title |
Artisanal fish fences pose broad and unexpected threats to the tropical coastal seascape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10051-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan A. Exton, Gabby N. Ahmadia, Leanne C. Cullen-Unsworth, Jamaluddin Jompa, Duncan May, Joel Rice, Paul W. Simonin, Richard K. F. Unsworth, David J. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 27% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 57% |
| Scientists | 28 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#302,169
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,515
of 58,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,154
of 365,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#81
of 1,342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.