| Title |
Coordinated representational reinstatement in the human hippocampus and lateral temporal cortex during episodic memory retrieval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09569-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Pacheco Estefan, M. Sánchez-Fibla, A. Duff, A. Principe, R. Rocamora, H. Zhang, N. Axmacher, P. F. M. J. Verschure |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 12% |
| Spain | 7 | 12% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 28 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 24% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 43 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#918,197
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,092
of 54,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,413
of 356,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#364
of 1,340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.