↓ Skip to main content

Clinical utility gene card for: blue cone monochromatism

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Clinical utility gene card for: blue cone monochromatism
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2011
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2010.232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Kohl, Christian P Hamel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,752,409
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1,825
of 3,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,690
of 186,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.