↓ Skip to main content

Computer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/tissue constructs

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Computer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/tissue constructs
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep21685
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Woo Jung, Jung-Seob Lee, Dong-Woo Cho

Abstract

Recently, much attention has focused on replacement or/and enhancement of biological tissues via the use of cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds with an architecture that mimics the tissue matrix, and with the desired three-dimensional (3D) external geometry. However, mimicking the heterogeneous tissues that most organs and tissues are formed of is challenging. Although multiple-head 3D printing systems have been proposed for fabricating heterogeneous cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds, to date only the simple exterior form has been realized. Here we describe a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system for this application. We aim to develop an algorithm to enable easy, intuitive design and fabrication of a heterogeneous cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds with a free-form 3D geometry. The printing paths of the scaffold are automatically generated from the 3D CAD model, and the scaffold is then printed by dispensing four materials; i.e., a frame, two kinds of cell-laden hydrogel and a support. We demonstrated printing of heterogeneous tissue models formed of hydrogel scaffolds using this approach, including the outer ear, kidney and tooth tissue. These results indicate that this approach is particularly promising for tissue engineering and 3D printing applications to regenerate heterogeneous organs and tissues with tailored geometries to treat specific defects or injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 212 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 26%
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 70 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Materials Science 17 8%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 48 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,459,901
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#61,024
of 123,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,201
of 298,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,770
of 3,432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.