| Title |
FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Peter McQuilton, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Massimiliano Izzo, Allyson L. Lister, Milo Thurston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 160 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 19% |
| United States | 18 | 11% |
| France | 10 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 60% |
| Scientists | 53 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 24% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#290,431
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#670
of 8,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,316
of 357,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#18
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.