↓ Skip to main content

A proof-of-concept study for the design of a VLP-based combinatorial HPV and placental malaria vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
A proof-of-concept study for the design of a VLP-based combinatorial HPV and placental malaria vaccine
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41522-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph M. Janitzek, Julianne Peabody, Susan Thrane, Philip H. R. Carlsen, Thor G. Theander, Ali Salanti, Bryce Chackerian, Morten A. Nielsen, Adam F. Sander

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Chemistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 13 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#10,412,673
of 18,888,807 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#44,435
of 101,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,082
of 281,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,888,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them