Regulation of evidence accumulation by pupil-linked arousal processes published as: https://t.co/fyoQyjVaLP #Nature_Human_Behaviour #biorxiv
RT @NatureHumBehav: People integrate information over time to make decisions, but they don’t do so optimally. Keung et al. show how distinc…
RT @NatureHumBehav: People integrate information over time to make decisions, but they don’t do so optimally. Keung et al. show how distinc…
People integrate information over time to make decisions, but they don’t do so optimally. Keung et al. show how distinct aspects of the pupil signal relate to distinct suboptimalities in perceptual decision-making https://t.co/P7mqzPU9HQ
Here we show how divisive normalization explains a recently discovered behavioral phenomenon in evidence accumulation (see our recent paper https://t.co/IbW7vth48i) that is difficult to account for with standard drift diffusion models. 2/6
RT @psychonsultant: 「意思決定でミスる原因」を探るため、108人の被験者にどっちの耳から音がするのかを直感で平均760回ほど選んでもらった結果、およそ22%ミスった。このときの目の動きや瞳孔を観察してバイアスの種類を特定すると、主に「重きの置き方」と「知識不…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Interested in why we do not integrate information ver time in an optimal fashion?. Keung et al. show how distinct aspec…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Interested in why we do not integrate information ver time in an optimal fashion?. Keung et al. show how distinct aspec…
Interested in why we do not integrate information ver time in an optimal fashion?. Keung et al. show how distinct aspects of the pupil signal relate to distinct suboptimalities in perceptual decision-making https://t.co/amoJ8Rk25D
RT @NRDlab: How does pupil dilation relate to evidence accumulation in a pulsed accumulation task? Read Jane's tweet storm (or, you know,…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
RT @janekeung129: Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how…
How does pupil dilation relate to evidence accumulation in a pulsed accumulation task? Read Jane's tweet storm (or, you know, the paper) to find out! https://t.co/DOUPvCJ42n
Excited to share my new paper with Todd Hagen and Bob Wilson @NRDlab on suboptimalities in evidence accumulation and how they relate to pupil, now out in @NatureHumBehav https://t.co/7KYEAL6JGW
To err is human....oops. 👀 Are eyes the window to our mistakes? via @EurekAlert, @UofA & @NatureHumBehav https://t.co/Nz04xizRxZ https://t.co/PobeD0HY2f
聴覚エビデンス蓄積が最適でないのは神経ノイズ、エビデンスの重みづけが不均等になること、先行試行の効果、全体的なバイアスの4種類からくる。ビデンスの重みづけが不均等になることの個人差は瞳孔反応の個人差、ノイズの試行ごとの変動は瞳孔反応の試行ごとの変動と関連。 https://t.co/BtA9d3gT4C