| Title |
The impact of proliferation-migration tradeoffs on phenotypic evolution in cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-39636-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill A. Gallaher, Joel S. Brown, Alexander R. A. Anderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,122,784
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,402
of 140,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,366
of 367,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#429
of 4,314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.