The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
A water budget dichotomy of rocky protoplanets from 26Al-heating
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Astronomy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41550-018-0688-5 |
| Authors |
Tim Lichtenberg, Gregor J. Golabek, Remo Burn, Michael R. Meyer, Yann Alibert, Taras V. Gerya, Christoph Mordasini |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 71% |
| Scientists | 17 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 36% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 36% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#157,748
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Nature Astronomy
#375
of 2,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,449
of 459,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Astronomy
#7
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 155.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.