Title |
Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1038/ejcn.2009.81 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M M E van Bakel, R Kaaks, E J M Feskens, S Rohrmann, A A Welch, V Pala, K Avloniti, Y T van der Schouw, D L van der A, H Du, J Halkjær, M J Tormo, A E Cust, F Brighenti, J W Beulens, P Ferrari, C Biessy, M Lentjes, E A Spencer, S Panico, G Masala, H B Bueno-de-Mesquita, P H M Peeters, A Trichopoulou, T Psaltopoulou, F Clavel-Chapelon, M Touvier, G Skeie, S Rinaldi, E Sonestedt, I Johansson, M Schulze, E Ardanaz, G Buckland, A Tjønneland, K Overvad, S Bingham, E Riboli, N Slimani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 29% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,166
of 3,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,155
of 94,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.