| Title |
Metagenomic engineering of the mammalian gut microbiome in situ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-018-0301-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlotta Ronda, Sway P. Chen, Vitor Cabral, Stephanie J. Yaung, Harris H. Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 101 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 62 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 417 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 21% |
| Researcher | 69 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 104 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 106 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 42 | 10% |
| Engineering | 16 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#356,033
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#389
of 5,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,926
of 449,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#11
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.