↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic engineering of the mammalian gut microbiome in situ

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
175 tweeters
patent
1 patent
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
Title
Metagenomic engineering of the mammalian gut microbiome in situ
Published in
Nature Methods, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41592-018-0301-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlotta Ronda, Sway P. Chen, Vitor Cabral, Stephanie J. Yaung, Harris H. Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 326 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 24%
Researcher 57 17%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 61 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 11%
Engineering 12 4%
Chemical Engineering 9 3%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 73 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#247,775
of 19,577,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#318
of 4,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,131
of 408,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#13
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,577,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.