| Title |
Quantum Hall effect based on Weyl orbits in Cd3As2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0798-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng Zhang, Yi Zhang, Xiang Yuan, Shiheng Lu, Jinglei Zhang, Awadhesh Narayan, Yanwen Liu, Huiqin Zhang, Zhuoliang Ni, Ran Liu, Eun Sang Choi, Alexey Suslov, Stefano Sanvito, Li Pi, Hai-Zhou Lu, Andrew C. Potter, Faxian Xiu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 25% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 107 | 48% |
| Materials Science | 34 | 15% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#954,102
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#31,294
of 98,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,773
of 430,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#643
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.