| Title |
Experimental evidence for sustained carbon sequestration in fire-managed, peat moorlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41561-018-0266-6 |
| Authors |
R. H. Marrs, E.-L. Marsland, R. Lingard, P. G. Appleby, G. T. Piliposyan, R. J. Rose, J. O’Reilly, G. Milligan, K. A. Allen, J. G. Alday, V. Santana, H. Lee, K. Halsall, R. C. Chiverrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 40% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 67% |
| Scientists | 16 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#457,381
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#895
of 3,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,409
of 446,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.