| Title |
Contrasting phylogeographic pattern among Eudyptes penguins around the Southern Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-35975-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. J. Frugone, A. Lowther, D. Noll, B. Ramos, P. Pistorius, G. P. M. Dantas, M. V. Petry, F. Bonadonna, A. Steinfurth, A. Polanowski, A. Raya Rey, N. A. Lois, K. Pütz, P. Trathan, B. Wienecke, E. Poulin, J. A. Vianna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 12 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 13% |
| Argentina | 6 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 62% |
| Scientists | 23 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#708,712
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,723
of 141,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,755
of 447,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#111
of 2,250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.