| Title |
How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen E. Grogan |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,530 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 672 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 285 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 163 | 4% |
| Canada | 126 | 3% |
| Australia | 73 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 55 | 1% |
| Germany | 53 | 1% |
| Spain | 47 | 1% |
| France | 33 | <1% |
| Other | 309 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2714 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3321 | 73% |
| Scientists | 1076 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 75 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 1% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 300 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 20% |
| Researcher | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 22% |
| Unknown | 80 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1754. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,549
of 24,489,051 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#12
of 2,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94
of 446,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 151.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.