Title |
Organic field-effect optical waveguides
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07269-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guangyao Zhao, Huanli Dong, Qing Liao, Jun Jiang, Yi Luo, Hongbing Fu, Wenping Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 16 | 29% |
Materials Science | 10 | 18% |
Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 15% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,966,181
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,761
of 47,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,183
of 343,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#693
of 1,371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.